This reminded me of the saying "ignorance is bliss." When I looked up the exact definition of the phrase, it said "Not knowing something is often more comfortable than knowing it." This is exactly what was happening in the play, and also occurs in real life. We think that if you don't know something, it's as if it never happened at all, which we all wish were true sometimes, but of course, is not. After discussing this in class and thinking about it after the play, I kept thinking about how words have absolutely no meaning to some people (like the deaf woman), but also have absolutely no meaning at all sometimes, and that is sometimes the best for us.
This saying "ignorance is bliss" contrasts another part in the play, where after the African American family left the house, the white man started talking poorly about them. The African American man, having just left the house, could hear them talking and came back inside very angry. If he had not heard them talk about it, it would not been a big deal at all, because he didn't know and it meant nothing to him. This ignorance probably would have been better than him hearing what they said. In this situation it was probably better to be ignorant about what they were saying, rather than hearing them.
I agree the play had an "ignorance is bliss" attribute to it. One moment that I did not connect until after seeing the play was when the woman (who was deaf in the first act) covered her ears in the second. Unlike the first act, she was choosing not to hear. I think the message is: sometimes we have to hear the tough things in order to go through life's tough issues. If everyone decided to be in "ignorant bliss" then how would society ever progress? Or change for the better?
ReplyDelete